Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Art installations will help city fight blight


July 22, 2009

An art installation sits in the storefront of this building on Valencia Street. (Cindy Chew/The Examiner)

The City is offering $500 to individual local artists to fill 19 vacant storefronts in an effort to avoid blight during the recession.

Taking a cue from cities such as New York, San Diego and San Jose, the pilot program will temporarily place original art installations in vacant storefront windows. The first to be filled will be in the mid-Market Street area, followed by Taylor Street in the Tenderloin, Third Street in the Bayview district and 24th Street in the Mission district.

“Art in Storefronts” encourages a temporary alternative that will “reinvigorate our neighborhoods and commercial corridors, improve streetscape conditions and safety, and support merchants by increasing foot traffic and instilling community pride,” according to a statement from Mayor Gavin Newsom.

“We also believe that the art installations will ultimately help get these spaces leased,” Newsom said in the statement.

As The Examiner reported earlier this month, storefronts emptied the most between September and March, but no notable businesses moved in, according to a San Francisco-based retail broker. As a result, the retail vacancy rate leaped in the past year from 3 or 4 percent to 12 or 13 percent.

Several incentives to get businesses to move in to vacant spaces have been in the works at City Hall for months. Tax breaks, fee waivers and some kind of credit are possibilities, and even a vacancy fee for property owners who fail to fill their spaces is being considered.

Advertisers have even capitalized on the empty stores by buying space for makeshift billboards, but that practice is illegal under strict San Francisco signage laws.

In the meantime, San Francisco will make do with artsy window dressings.

The Arts Commission and Triple Base Gallery, a Mission district organization with previous storefront-art experience, will pick the artists. All winners must be San Francisco residents and are encouraged to incorporate the essence of the neighborhood in the final product.

“All genres of art will be considered, with an emphasis on high-quality presentations that reflect the positive qualities of the community and create an attractive display to draw potential renters,” according to the application.

Applications must be in by Aug. 14.



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

carl

Jul 21, 2009

$9500 for blighted store front windows
lets see..how many starving homeless people could be helped with $9500? Oh thats right...none. wonderful...
the cold sole of San Francisco...oh my writers block is gone..thanks!

 

dan.

Jul 22, 2009

hey carl,
get over yourself. $9500 is a drop in the bucket. you seem like the type that would add that comment to any story that talks about the city spending money.

i'm thankful that i live in a city that even considers alternative uses for vacant spaces, and at the same time, gives artists a chance to show work. this seems like a good thing.

 

Jul 22, 2009

Wouldn't an *evil* chain store be sensible given the tax revenue?

 

dg

Jul 22, 2009

Agreed. This is one of the few good ideas to come out of city hall lately. Such creative (and cheap) solutions should be cheered and encouraged, not complained about.

 

jd

Jul 22, 2009

I have a better idea.

Stop wasting tax payer money on art installations, graffiti removal, and enforcing anti-loitering laws aimed at the homeless on the street and lift the ridiculous 'anti-chain' policies in SF and let businesses that can actually afford the rents into SF to generate sales tax revenue and encourage some urban renewal.

Oh, and (of course) lift the ridiculous Prop 13 cap on commercial properties.

See that way we change these storefronts from being an expenses into revenue. Generating cash for the city and state as well as providing much needed services for the residents.

Radical, I know.

 

jd

Jul 22, 2009

@Dan, apparently millions and millions of American's live in cities who consider these things, "Taking a cue from cities such as New York, San Diego and San Jose ..."

That $9500 expense might be a drop in the bucket, but compared to the lost revenue an honest to goodness business would be generating the loss is amplified substantially.

@SF residents, we need to stop protesting and freezing out businesses who are fighting to enter the SF marketplace, such as the American Apparel debacle in the Mission, and start welcoming them to the city.

What good is city devoid of 'chain' stores when it is covered in blight and lacks critical goods and services.

American Apparel would have provided low cost clothing in an area of the city where many residents due not have reliable transportation. Instead the residents have another empty storefront that attracts crime and drains city coffers.

 

Art is Art

Jul 22, 2009

And an empty store front window= an empty store= no income to the owner of the property = no sales tax to the city= no jobs for people

 

Jul 22, 2009

Today's progressive activists...tomorrow's slumlords.

 

Jos nb

Jul 22, 2009

graffiti leads to more graffiti
blight leads to more blight
poverty leads to more poverty
art leads to more art

 

JK

Jul 23, 2009

Why is everyone so anti-art? Isn't paying the local artists in the community part of creating jobs? Local artists need to pay their rent and eat, too.

If it worked in New York and San Diego... what is everyone so afraid of?

 

Sytiva Sheehan

Aug 10, 2009

I agree with JK! It is a positive move. It creates community unity, It allows more of the people to be involved in change. If the artists in San Francisco are given the opportunity to help make a positive contribution at the same time: Do you know how powerful that is? Wow! It can change a lot of things, so allow it a chance. Artist want to help too, and sometimes that is there only avenue. It is sad to see so many negative comments. Have a wonderful day!
Sytiva Sheehan

 

Arlene

Sep 27, 2009

The City needs to get rid of all these
restrictions of what can go in where,
and welcome any retail businesses into
the City. No Commercial landlord leaves
their spaces empty; they can't find a
tenants. They are lowering their rents
and offering free rent; now its the City's turn to do their part, not put art in these empty spaces. The businesses and Landlords bring revenue
to the City, not some artist who wants
to display their work for Free.

 

Dec 2, 2009

the art is great but should not be preferred to an actual store in these storefronts.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story