Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Alcohol fee brewing in City Hall


June 9, 2009

Drink up: Figures haven’t been finalized, but Supervisor John Avalos says 5-cents extra for a bottle of beer is possible. (Examiner file photo)

SAN FRANCISCO — A pint of beer and bottle of wine or spirits could soon become more expensive under a proposal to generate revenue amid The City’s economic crisis.

Supervisor John Avalos said he will ask the city attorney today to draft legislation that would impose a fee on alcohol.

The fee would offset city costs related to the consumption of alcohol in San Francisco.

“I think we can afford to do it. It makes for good public policy,” Avalos said.

He’s exploring assessing the fee at the point of wholesale. It would then be passed on to the consumer.

Avalos did not commit to an amount, but offered a possibility of 5 cents for a beer, a larger fee on a bottle of wine and an even more for hard liquor.

Bruce Livingston, executive director of the Marin Institute, an alcohol-industry watchdog, said booze takes a large toll, tens of millions of dollars, on The City’s resources. Emergency-room visits, fire department responses, traffic enforcement and the adjudication of alcohol-related crimes are just some of the expenses.

“It’s an untapped source of revenue existing for the programs that the alcohol industry should contribute to,” said Livingston, who has been in talks with Avalos about the fee.

Avalos estimated the fee could generate between $16 million and $25 million next fiscal year, “to start.” 

The legislation comes after Mayor Gavin Newsom submitted a balanced city budget to the Board of Supervisors for review and
adoption, closing a $438 million deficit. The spending plan includes cuts to health and human services.

Avalos’ proposal is similar to other fees pending before the Board of Supervisors.

Newsom has included in his proposed budget a 33-cent fee for a pack of cigarettes, which he introduced to the Board of Supervisors on June 2.

The City spends more than $44 million annually to pick up litter throughout San Francisco, and $10.7 million of that is for discarded cigarettes, according to the Mayor’s Office. The 33-cent fee is expected to raise $11 million annually to pay for cleanup.

Newsom had also proposed a fee in 2007 on large stores that sell drinks with high-fructose corn syrup and is expected to introduce the fee in the coming weeks for the board’s consideration.

While a tax must go to the ballot box, a fee only requires approval by the Board of Supervisors.

Proposals to generate revenue

Several fees coming out of City Hall have been introduced to help offset costs incurred from health care and picking up litter in San Francisco:

Fee type       Annual revenue    Author    Status
Cigarettes     $11 million    Newsom    Pending
Soda             N/A    Newsom    Being studied
Alcohol          $16M to $25M    Avalos    Drafting

jsabatini@sfexaminer.com



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Missiondweller

Jun 9, 2009

How about the city just lives within its means like the rest of us. That's even better public policy.

 

Joe Twelve-Pack

Jun 9, 2009

That's it. Just keep taxing. Don't consider really cutting costs. Just raise taxes. That's the answer. That's all you got to do. Just keep creating new taxes. SF's budget is bigger than mosts states. I hate the bored of stupids.

 

Peter Vaernet, RN

Jun 9, 2009

In light of the Governor's failure to raise the State alcohol excise tax, a San Francisco alcohol fee is completely reasonable in light of the massive social damage alcohol reaps on our communities.

 

kellog64

Jun 9, 2009

does this clown do anything besides dream up new taxes?

 

stkyrice

Jun 10, 2009

Being a native of San Francisco for 55 years, this is the first time I'm seriously thinking of leaving the city by the bay. Due to high rents, fees, and taxes, its just not worth it anymore.

 

Commonsense

Jun 10, 2009

Another tax! Just what everyone needs. Folks, we voted these fools into office, we desperately need to vote them out of office. Please, get active.

 

Jim S

Jul 22, 2009

We all wind up paying the health, accident, violence and litter costs from alcohol. It would be more fair to add the costs to the cost of alcohol.

 

The Equalizer

Jul 22, 2009

@Peter Vaernet and Jim S: Alcohol doesn't inflict damage. People do. How about holding them responsible instead of the millions of us who enjoy beer and wine responsibly. Seems like you're fostering the victim mentality.

 

fdgf

Jan 23, 2010

Rip Blu-ray DVDs, common DVDs into video formats and convert almost all of videos from one to another,Blu Ray Ripper||Blu Ray Ripper for Mac*Blu ray Converter*Blu ray Copy*Blu ray Maker*Blu ray Burner*Blu ray Backup*Blu ray Cloner

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story