Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Age question inhibits home sale

By: Andrea Koskey
Examiner Staff Writer
November 7, 2009

Costly audit: A historic-value assessment on Sarah and Rawson Groves Hobart’s home cost them $3,000.

Burlingame — Planning officials — caught in a property rights battle about whether a home for sale on Newlands Avenue has historical value — on Monday will discuss how to best proceed in the future with historic designations for homes in the Burlingame Park neighborhood.

When Sarah Groves Hobart and her husband tried to sell their home earlier this year they did not think it was historic.

In 2004, when they first purchased the house at 1540 Newlands Ave., Groves Hobart said she and her husband contacted the Burlingame Historical Society to have them research whether they had purchased a historic property. Documents came back weeks later saying the home had no historic value.

Five years later, while trying to sell the house, a prospective buyer was told by city staff that a historical assessment of the property would be required for any project requiring action by the Planning Commission.

Groves Hobart said the potential buyer had gone to the city’s planning department to find out what kind of permits he would need to add another story to the home. City officials say an inquiry was made about possibly demolishing the existing structures.
In response, the couple paid $3,000 for an independent review that determined the home has no historic value. That determination, however, came too late.

The buyer subsequently withdrew the offer to purchase the home.

“It’s been disturbing to find out how vulnerable a house over 50 years old is,” Groves Hobart said.
If the home was historic, any changes to the house could require environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. 

According to Burlingame’s Web site, the city has taken inventory of 23 homes that could possibly be considered historic, but no research has been done to find out if they are.

On Monday night, the Burlingame planning commission will discuss the city’s role to determine if any of these 23 potential properties are historic.

Bill Meeker, the city’s community development director, said the Groves Hobart situation specifically will not be discussed at the meeting.

“We need to know how the city is required to handle any discretionary decisions that involved properties,” he said. “When the city receives information that it could be historic, we must perform a review and find out if it is.”

Groves Hobart said the city’s lack of a process has cost her family an all-cash sale — and $3,000.

The couple will be at Monday’s meeting, she said.

akoskey@sfexaminer.com



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Ella

Nov 8, 2009

Perhaps if the facts of this story were reported accurately, readers might have a more accurate understanding of the situation.

The buyers of the house were not just "inquiring about" demolishing the home: they planned to demolish the home. That piece of information seems to be conveniently omitted from every article published about this incident, the facts of which have been so distorted by the current homeowners as to border on propaganda.

The house in question has been a gem on Newlands Avenue for decades. Whether or not it has official historical significance is irrelevant. The house is a well-designed, classic architectural beauty. It is one more unique-to-Burlingame house in danger of being replaced by another of the tasteful-but-conventional custom-designed homes becoming ever more ubiquitous in a city whose drawing power is its beautiful old houses.

 

George Tipton

Nov 8, 2009

The reason "information" about demolishing the home is omitted from every story is because there isn't any evidence of that. Sure, the buyers wanted to know what they could do to the house. There was no plan to demolish the home, despite the current mayor-elect's best effort to spread this rumor. Go down to City Hall and ask for any records that show there were plans to demolish the home. You won't get any. The "demolish story" is just a rumor and part of the cover-up.

 

Ella

Nov 8, 2009

<< Go down to City Hall and ask for any records that show there were plans to demolish the home. You won't get any. >>

That's because buyers are not required to submit demolishment plans prior to purchase.

The buyers were developers whose primary intention was to make a profit on the development of the property.

I assume that you would have no problem were this house to be torn down.

 

Stella

Nov 9, 2009

Ella, this home is beautiful - as are many homes in Burlingame - some of which have been demolished.

The process by Blaylcok was a disgrace in this instance and the voters made that clear at the last election.

 

Ella

Nov 9, 2009

The only thing made clear at the last election is that money talks: the candidate with the deepest pockets got the most votes. Local politics have indeed become a disgraceful process.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Sports

Cardinal has Luck going into Big Game showdown

Though he’s just a redshirt freshman, Andrew Luck... Full story

Entertainment

Reno Santa event inspired by SF revelers

About 5,000 Santa costume-clad folks are expected to... Full story

Entertainment

Scoop: Is J. Lo having ex tailed?

Is Jennifer Lopez playing hardball in her battle with... Full story