Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Dear BART, please avoid a strike

By: Tamara Barak Aparton
Examiner Staff Writer
July 1, 2009

Looking for a ride: A strike would be devastating for the 350,000 people that commute on BART daily. (Examiner file photo)

SAN FRANCISCO — A strongly worded letter to BART from 15 Bay Area lawmakers expresses concern about the direction of current labor negotiations and what a strike could mean for those who depend on the transit agency.

BART, which increases fares today, has been at the negotiating table with unions for 90 days, seeking $100 million in concessions from its 2,800 unionized workers in order to help close a $250 million deficit for the next four years.

But 15 Bay Area lawmakers wrote in the letter that they are “concerned by reports on the district’s bargaining positions, which we believe has the potential to spark a labor dispute with the unions representing workers at the district.”

The original deadline for the contract talks was June 30, and two of the unions representing the most workers voted to authorize a strike, which could have started as early as today.

Late last week, however, the transit agency and the two biggest employee unions agreed to extend negotiations till midnight July 9.

In the letter, which is addressed to BART General Manager Dorothy Duggar and dated just days before the agreement in the tumultuous bargaining process, lawmakers urge transit leaders to bargain in good faith with employee unions.

Also mentioned in the letter is a request by the BART board of directors for Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger not to grant a cooling-off period after the deadline for negotiations.

BART spokesman Linton Johnson said district officials are well aware of the impact a strike would have on the Bay Area economy.

“That’s why we asked for no cooling-off period,” he said. “So that if, God forbid, there were a strike, it would happen in the summer and not around the time the Bay Bridge closes.”

Johnson said he appreciates the letter from legislators, who are standing up for their constituents.

“We share the same constituents and we’re standing up for them as well, by making sure we can offer service at an affordable price,”
he said.

If there were a strike, it would leave 350,000 daily riders in the lurch, the letter said.

“We’re very concerned about a potential strike. It means people can’t get to work and school and get where they need to go,” said Assemblywoman Fiona Ma, whose District 12 includes San Francisco, Daly City, Colma and Broadmoor.

Jean Hamilton, president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 3553, which represents about 200 middle managers, said that while negotiations appear to be improving, she shares the concerns expressed by legislators.

“The unions are very much at the table with a goal of reaching a fair and equitable solution. We just hope the district is there for the same reasons, too,” Hamilton said.

Possible walkout spurs backup plan

If BART workers strike, the more than 130,000 commuters who descend on San Francisco each day will be looking for new ways to get to work — with highway and street gridlock a likely result.

On Tuesday, Muni unveiled its contingency plan to deal with parking, traffic and directing commuters unfamiliar
with The City’s transit system.

The plan involves close coordination with Caltrain, SamTrans, AC Transit and ferry services, and is designed to quickly connect displaced BART commuters with alternative transportation.

Muni service along the BART corridor will be beefed up, including the 14-Mission, 49-Van Ness-Mission, J-Church to and from Balboa Park/Geneva, and N-Judah to and from Caltrain at Fourth and King streets.

City employees will also assist motorists when garages are full. The casual carpool pickup areas will expand to include a dozen additional spots on Beale Street, just south of Folsom Street. The boarding spots will be in effect between 3 and 7 p.m. Taxis will also be deployed to key areas.

Muni officials are also urging commuters to bike or walk, if possible, or avoid peak commuting periods, telecommute or take a vacation.
For more information, visit www.sfmta.com, call 511 or visit www.511.org.

tbarak@sfexaminer.com
 



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Jul 1, 2009

bart management and bargaining in good faith......hah!it even sounds funny in the same sentence

 

Missiondweller

Jul 1, 2009

More evidence our politicians represent unions, not taxpayers.

 

john robert

Jul 1, 2009

Like dealing with spoiled children! One of the reasons were coming to yet another impass, with a predictable, give them whatever they want result, is the politicians stepped in last union go 'round and forced management's hand. to quote the great comics line "It's time we grabbed the bull by the tail and faced the situation squarly!"

 

BartRider

Jul 1, 2009

The BART organization is like Alice in Wonderland - according to the salary data posted on the Contra Costa Times website, 703 out of 3200 employees at BART made over $100,000 last year, much of it from overtime. From the job descriptions, many of the people making overtime appear to have management or at least exempt position titles. Any organization that is not controlling overtime is not being run properly - people shouldn't be able to augment their base pay by 50% with OT. I also read in the Chron this morning that a BART employee pays $82 a month for full health coverage for all his or her dependents. In the real world, this would cost the employee around $600 a month, with a $50 copay, if they were on a Kaiser plan, for example. Talk about gold-plated treatment!

 

No Raises for BART

Jul 1, 2009

The letter was written by two of the unions and then signed by the legislators, who rely on those union votes (per the Chron).
I hope they do strike for a couple of days, and then wind up with a 3 percent pay CUT!

 

YUZH

Jul 1, 2009

The most expensive CalPERS Medical Plan charges 2257 per family per month, and BART employee only pays 81.95 per month for it, rest of it pick up by BART and our fare increases. I am not on the Union Side on this one.

 

Andy K

Jul 1, 2009

Politician should stay out of this. Most of these people are over paid for the work they do. I'm all for fair compensation, but this is ridiculous. Let it go to arbitration - it should be easy to get this resolved.

 

sfcuir

Jul 1, 2009

Instead of supporting the overpaid BART employees, our lawmakers ought to be representing their constituents by demanding that the governor send in the National Guard to run BART so the union can exercise its right to strike for the next six months. That might help them understand how it is for their customers who are taking big pay cuts and didn't have any benefits to start with!

 

bartcommuter

Jul 1, 2009

It amazes me how people turn on one another in times like these. And BART management disgusts me that it would disparage its own workers, the very same workers that must deal with the public or serve the public everyday. And the public just eats it up. Are you all really on the side of management which are like CEOs(and paid as much)? No wonder the big companies were able to get over on the regular Joes, they don't even know whose side they should fight for.

 

shirley

Jul 17, 2009

That is a bad idea to strike now. I just saw on the news that the Union has all the strikes signs ready to go and union members are signed up to carry strike signs. You have to remember that your strike pay will about 30.00 a week, also your union representatives will get full pay while you walk the strike line, ask your union representative about this?????

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story