Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Parking in The City just became more expensive

By: Joshua Sabatini
Examiner Staff Writer
May 28, 2009

SAN FRANCISCO — It is not official, but parking in The City will be more expensive and meters will have to be fed past 6 p.m. and on Sundays.

The cost of parking and meters, which falls under the jurisdiction of the Municipal Transportation Agency, has become a focal point in the ongoing budget discussions for the cash-strapped agency.

In the third and final hearing before the Board of Supervisors, which must approve the transit agency’s spending plan, a motion to reject the budget was voted down 6-5, with the promise that parking and meters will become more expensive.

The transit agency is facing as much as a $16 million deficit and those supervisors rejecting the budget — John Avalos, David Campos, Ross Mirkarimi, Chris Daly and Eric Mar — said the gap was closed more on the backs of riders than drivers.

The transit agency’s board of directors voted April 30 to approve a $766 million budget. It includes a July 1 fare hike from $1.50 to $2 and service reductions.

Avalos advocated for parking-meter enforcement later than 6 p.m. and on Sundays, along with increasing parking rates in city garages to reduce service cuts and fare hikes.

Transit agency chief Nat Ford said Muni would present Avalos’ proposals along with others to its board of directors Tuesday as part of a discussion on how to deal with an already looming deficit.

Supervisor Sophie Maxwell indicated that she was satisfied with Ford’s commitment.

“[Muni] will have to make parking changes. Parking changes it seems to me are inevitable. And anyone who parks needs to understand that,” she said.

jsabatini@sfexaminer.com
 



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

FeedThePiggies

May 28, 2009

Stupid. Plain F'ing stupid.

 

I got an idea

May 28, 2009

How about toll roads in SF... Ya, lets charge tolls for using Mission or Market or Geary. We can charge pedestrians and bicycles too. Or, how about we put parking meters in front of everyone's house and then people will have to pay to come out onto SF streets all together. With that kind of money muni will work great.

 

PARKING EXTORSION

May 28, 2009

SF just lost another shopper. I will no longer shop for anything in SF unless I am offered free parking. Good bye SF, hello Peninsula.

 

May 28, 2009

Yes, because you have such variety of stores in the Peninsula. What a greedy a-hole you are. Public transportation benefits all, and San Francisco is a Transit first city. That's why you have BART.

And oh, by the way, you misspelled extortion. Perhaps you might try attending school instead of shopping next time.

 

May 28, 2009

Yes, we actually should charge for driving downtown. Those of you who come in from outside the city, clog up our streets, hit pedestrians, drive too fast south of market on your way to the bridge, cause damage to the city, and you should have to pay for the use of our streets. It's easy for people outside the city to have an opinion on this...but this really is an issue you can't comment on, since you don't pay taxes here.

 

May 28, 2009

This article is nothing more than journalistic flame bait. I love the emphasis on parking fees rising rather than talking about the drastic service cuts the people who LIVE here have to endure. You come here for the weekend, deal with it. If you have enough money to DRIVE here and SHOP here, you have enough money to pay for PARKING here.

 

citizenkarma

May 28, 2009

I predict that this petty, stupid move will enrage voters like no other assinine thing the BOSupes has done in years. And how much to change the little signs on every single parking meter in town? I'd like to see the cost on this too. Supes that vote YES on this will not be forgotten at election time. Just watch what happens to small businesses and entertainment venues open at night. And see how many more parking tickets go uncollected.

 

absolutelyfcked

May 28, 2009

Let's start by getting rid of all the free parking for city employees around SF City Hall. Muni needs to be self-sustaining, meaning riders should pay for the luxury of riding muni. I think a fare of $5 per one-way trip should balance muni's budget. What's fair is fair. As fair as the toll on the bridges are concern, they should raise the toll to $10. I and my firm with our employees will be moving out of San Francisco at the end of our lease.

 

SF Small Business Owner and Resident

May 28, 2009

I live in an area where there is NO residential parking permits. The only option is a meter. I cannot take public transportation to work, it is a hour ride for 6 miles. Anywhere without a meter is open space lots that are blocks away from my home and where my car has been broken into and vandalized multiple times. I pay my taxes here as a resident and a business owner. This is truely becoming a very unfriendly city. How about MUNI managing it's money better?

 

Death to Bureaucracy

May 28, 2009

Let's start by scrapping ridiculous city transport bureacracy that means Bus Drivers and Cable Car Drivers earn $125k/yr and work the system to retire on $150k. Yeah - you didn't know that? FYI my source is the drivers themselves..

 

DinSF78

May 28, 2009

Why should drivers be penalized for MUNI's deficits? The riders should have to pay for MUNI. What does a parking garage have to do with riding a bus??? Seems a bit backwards. How bout someone fixes the MUNI "union"? Other than UAW, I don't know any union that allows its employees to just NOT show up for work, no call, multiple times, without repercussion!! This is what happens when you allow workers/employees to have more rights than the owners/City/customers. MUNI needs to declare bankruptcy and allow an independent auditor to come in and restructure it. I can't wait to leave SF, and CA for that matter. 3 months to go....YAY!

 

It's SF, No Wonder it Fails

May 28, 2009

As a City worker, SF Gov continually fails to do much of anything right. They're own reports show; only 12% of meter money collected, only 72% of Muni fares collected, $500 Million behind on street repair, $35 Million set for technology upgrades for Courts/DA/Pub. Def, etc. instead was spent on housing, Don't enforce the bike license fee, etc. etc., etc. Instead of rushing to raise fees, why don't they actually attempt to enforce collections of fees owed. Heck, $10.74 of my cell phone bill is $2.67 SF911 Fee, with $8.07 for SF County Fee. State VLF goes down on older cars, but SF creates $20 VLF Fee. As with the State, SF loves to spend & fails to cut in areas obvious to most worker where we see cuts can be made.

 

joe no dough

May 28, 2009

Meters that run past 6pm and on Sundays? And how does one go out for dinner without dealing with ticking parking meters? SF can shove their meters up somewhere I won't mention. I guess they won't mind the loss of business.

 

flutterbysf

May 28, 2009

This is OUTRAGEOUS! It already costs an arm and a leg to live in the city and this will only force more and more people out as well as keep out potential revenue from visitors for shopping, restuarants, etc. I THINK THE 50CENT MUNI FARE HIKE, EGREGIOUS PARKING TICKET FINES AND ALREADY EXISTING NUMEROUS ERRONEOUS LOCALIZED FEES SHOULD BE ENOUGH TO FIX THE BUDGET GAP!

 

Bad Idea

May 28, 2009

I take public transportation to work and drive on the weekends. Muni should do a better job collecting on fares. I notice many people riding Muni without paying and often many of the drivers seem to just let it happen or sometimes even wave the passenger by so he or she could get going. Muni should use a Fastrak like system like in other countries.

I agree with other people here, the increase of parking rates and extending meter hours will just cause SF to lose customers, which means more businesses closing or leaving SF, which means less jobs... and so on.

 

anne

May 28, 2009

Well, I will then either bike or use my car often now due to filthy muni environment and the reduction of services. These move made by the city is counterproductive and city will lose more money faster than it would take for them to reserve more transit for public dependence and also for raising funds due to immediate payment issued prior to boarding.

 

Reality Driver

May 28, 2009

There is still no dedicated parking for hovercrafts. Helipads are also scarce. Clearly, the City must make my arcane travel needs more convenient!

 

byebyeSFshopping

May 28, 2009

Guess I'll have to spend more of my money at Stonestown and Serramonte Malls and eat out in SF less often. $.25 per 8 minutes at a meter to feed the bloated salaries and benefits at MUNI is robbery and I won't pay it. Especially when city employee elites have free parking near city hall so they don't feel the pain. Let this be a reminder for the next supervisor election...any candidate associated with the 'progressives' means they want to tax the hell out of you to promote their utopian misguided dreams. Vote for moderates SF!

 

Commonsense

May 28, 2009

Folks, you got what ya' voted for. Enjoy.

 

May

May 28, 2009

25 cents for 8 minutes??? i would love to park where you're parking, because where I work downtown it's 25 cents for 6 minutes!

 

WTF?

Jun 2, 2009

Another ugly band-aid for San Francisco. This will deaden the city and create less income in the long-term...and it's always stupid things like this that lead to biggger problems....hmmm like more drunk driving after dinner

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Your Name:

Comment:




World

Fortune tellers: Year of Tiger isn't Tiger's year, but Obama to shine

It's the Year of the Tiger, but Chinese fortune tellers say it'll be a rough patch for the world's most famous one: disgraced golfer Tiger Woods. Full story

Local

Notorious penguin Harry survives infection

Fans of The City’s most famous penguins can... Full story

Local

Jackson doctor back in court in April to find out date for next major step in case

Michael Jackson's doctor returns to court in April to find out the date for the next major step in the case — a proceeding that will reveal for the first time the evidence the prosecution believes will show his "gross negligence" was the direct cause of the pop star's death. Full story