Local

[Print]  [Email]        

Muni Metro lines may speed up

By: Mike Aldax
Examiner Staff Writer
January 12, 2009

Muni trains could increase their speed through the tunnel from West Portal to Forest Hill station. (Cindy Chew/The Examiner)

SAN FRANCISCO — Hold on to your seats, Muni riders: Plans for speedier streetcars are threatening to zip you to work on time.

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, oft-criticized for its sluggish light-rail vehicles, is looking at ways to increase the speed limit on a stretch of Muni subway track between West Portal and Forest Hill to 50 mph. The top speed there is now 40 mph.

The only existing portion of subway in which the speed limit reaches 50 mph is the straight shot between the Castro and Embarcadero stations, according to the transit agency.

Two agency directors have expressed even more lust for speed. At the transit agency’s board meeting last week, Malcolm Heinicke and Cameron Beach said they wanted to raise the limit to 50 mph on another stretch of typically slow track. The directors were referring to a 35 mph inbound stretch from the Forest Hill station to a curve in the track before the Castro station.

“Why are we not looking at 50 [mph there]?” Beach asked Kenneth McDonald, the transit agency’s chief operating officer, at Thursday’s meeting.

Speeds of 50 mph, McDonald said, would create wear and tear on the streetcars as they brake before the Eureka Curve. Beach and Heinicke were skeptical of the answer, saying there appears to be enough distance to justify 50 mph along the stretch.

“The brakes supply the same weight whether you are going into West Portal outbound or into the Eureka Curve inbound,” Beach said.

Speeding up trains between Forest Hill and the Eureka Curve “will have a much greater commute benefit than increasing speeds on shorter segments,” Heinicke said.

A decade ago, Muni, which carries more than 700,000 riders per day, was mandated by voters to reach a systemwide on-time performance of 85 percent — a tall order the transit agency has yet to deliver. In the past four years, Muni’s overall on-time performance has hovered around 70 percent, according to its latest data. Vehicles are considered off schedule if they are more than one minute early or four minutes late.

Along with increasing speed limits for light-rail vehicles, Muni is in the middle of a massive project to rehabilitate its tracks, which meet federal guidelines in much of the tunnels but are substandard on city streets, McDonald said.

The transit agency said it’s also progressing on projects to time traffic signals on city streets to favor Muni vehicles, as well as on a long-awaited overhaul of its route system — known as the Transit Effectiveness Project — which includes increasing bus and streetcar service on the busiest routes, including the popular N-Judah, J-Church and M-Ocean View lines.

How fast can Muni vehicles travel?

The City’s transit agency is hoping to increase the speed limit on one line.

Current Muni speed limits for subway:

  • Between Embarcadero to Castro stations: 50 mph
  • Between Castro station and Eureka Curve: 30 mph
  • Between Eureka Curve and Forest Hill: 35 mph
  • Between Forest Hill and West Portal: 40 mph

Proposed speed limit changes:

  • Between Forest Hill and West Portal: increase to 50 mph

maldax@sfexaminer.com



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines



 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

XNCD

Jan 11, 2009

How about 60 or 65 mph between Eureka Curve and Forest Hill?

 

J

Jan 12, 2009

I thought they fixed this problem when they shut the down West Portal station through Castro in 2007 and some of 2008?

 

gp

Jan 12, 2009

Other than masking the incompetence of the track and overhead maintenance crew, there is no excuse for not operating at designed speed. The subway was originally designed for faster speeds but because of improper maintenance, they've reduced the speeds over the years. The board needs to put the pressure on the execs to get them to put the pressure on the maintenance crew. IT's ludicrous to think that operating slower will save on maintenance at the expense of the riders. If the maintenance departments don't want to work hard, then they should be replaced with people willing to do the work.

 

gp

Jan 12, 2009

Other than masking the incompetence of the track and overhead maintenance crew, there is no excuse for not operating at designed speed. The subway was originally designed for faster speeds but because of improper maintenance, they've reduced the speeds over the years. The board needs to put the pressure on the execs to get them to put the pressure on the maintenance crew. IT's ludicrous to think that operating slower will save on maintenance at the expense of the riders. If the maintenance departments don't want to work hard, then they should be replaced with people willing to do the work.

 

intransit

Jan 12, 2009

To arrive at West Portal Station and dwell for minutes. These efforts are all noble, but miss the real issues, one being traffic and passengers criss-crossing in front of trains ready to leave.

 

bumbler

Jan 12, 2009

how about instead of faster cars that pose a danger to the riders inside when an inattentive driver realizes he has to break really quickly, they focus on getting cars to their stops on time?

 

Very Frustrated Commuter

Jan 12, 2009

Before the ill-fated ATCS train control system was placed in operation in 1998, the normal speed in the subway was 50 MPH and trains would run at that speed if the old signal system indicated that the track was clear. However, since the ATCS, trains have been running very slow and even stopping for no apparent reason at all. ATCS was a boondoggle from the beginning and it should have never been installed in the first place.

 

goodmaab

Jan 12, 2009

what are the odds, of the first derailment occuring in the first 3 months of 2009?

 

Cathy

Jan 16, 2009

nope, honey. One short section between Forest Hill and West Port will, unfortunatelly, not save the commuters...

 

sfmike64

Feb 9, 2009

The shutdown between WP and Castro last year was to replace all of the overhead wire (which supplies the current that makes the trains run) in the tunnel. The original overhead was installed back in the 1970s and was due for replacement. The poster complaining about the ATCS system seems to think that this is still 1996. Muni has its problems but that's not one of them anymore.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Local

Strike outside Grand Hyatt, Newsom gets involved

Hotel workers in San Francisco are continuing to picket... Full story

Entertainment

Blackbird boasts fun, classic cocktails

A long list of stunning and proper classic cocktails,... Full story

Sports

Cal QB looking to erase bad memory against Beavers

Two years after his fourth-quarter mistake against Oregon State cost California a shot at becoming the top-ranked team in the nation, Kevin Riley can't escape the images of his blunder. Full story