San Francisco Examiner  circulation | classifieds | autos | real estate | jobs | advertise
   
Monster
View today's E-Dition

Thursday, September 9, 2010 | Last Update 12:54 PDT
click for forecast
Untitled Document
Home News Politics Local Opinion Economy Sports Lifestyle Buy, Sell & More Jobs Homes Cars
Nation World Under the Dome Ken Garcia Beltway Confidential Weather Mobile Site Contact
Under the Dome California Nation World Video
Under the Dome California Beltway Confidential White House Congress Michael Barone Byron York
Under the Dome Law & Disorder Prop 8 Ken Garcia Melissa Griffin City Hall People Real Estate Events Calendar
Editorials Nate Beeler's Toons Blogs Michael Barone Byron York
Economy Page Real Estate Technology
49ers/Raiders/NFL Warriors/NBA Sharks/NHL Giants/A's/MLB Soccer Colleges Golf Prep
Movies Television Health Events Calendar Fall Arts preview
Classifieds Stuff for Sale Post Free Ad
Find a Job Post a Job Career Tools
For Sale For Rent
New Used Certified Pre-Owned

Lifestyle
[Print]  [Email]         Share    

Movie review: `Dinner for Schmucks,' remake of a classic French farce, is an unsatisfying meal

By: CHRISTY LEMIRE
Associated Press
07/29/10 3:45 AM PDT

There's a lot less bite in "Dinner for Schmucks" than there was in the classic French farce that was its inspiration.

Whereas "The Dinner Game" ("Le Diner de Cons") from celebrated writer-director Francis Veber was a tight, sharp satire of societal pretension — and was nominated for six Cesar Awards in 1999 — this remake seems more interested in easy, broad slapstick.

That's unsurprising coming from Jay Roach, director of the "Austin Powers" movies, "Meet the Parents" and "Meet the Fockers." Still, Roach takes his sweet time getting to the big, wacky evening at the film's climax. "Dinner for Schmucks" is 34 minutes longer than its predecessor, and feels like it. As Steve Carell and Paul Rudd get to know each other during a series of mishaps and misunderstandings, the pacing drags and the script takes this twosome through some seriously time-consuming, hit-and-miss detours en route to a predictably safe ending.

But Carell, being the smart, sensitive comic actor that he is, infuses what might have been an insufferably obnoxious character with some real humanity. You come to care about this guy, especially once you learn how he stumbled into his sad-sack life. The same can't be said for Rudd's character — the straight man in the equation — because he's drawn so plainly, it's hard to feel emotionally invested in whether he suffers or succeeds.

Rudd stars as Tim Conrad, a financial analyst on the verge of a promotion at a competitive private equity firm. But first, he must impress his boss (Bruce Greenwood) at a secret monthly dinner where the company elite compete to see who can bring the biggest idiot as their guest. Tim's sophisticated girlfriend Julie (Stephanie Szostak) is appalled at the cruelty of this concept but — clearly being an idiot himself — he goes through with it anyway, hoping to impress her enough that she'll finally say yes to his repeated marriage proposals. Flawed logic, but whatever.

When Tim literally runs into Barry Speck (Carell), a kindhearted IRS employee and amateur taxidermist, he knows he's found his schmuck. In the original film, the poor, unsuspecting fool builds models of famous monuments using matchsticks. Barry makes intricate dioramas using dead mice he's lovingly dressed up and placed in whimsical settings; the details of them, highlighted at the film's start, are hilarious and awesome at once.

Being clueless about everything else in life, though, Barry gets his nights mixed up and gloms onto Tim early. Since he's such a decent fellow, he tries to help Tim out of a series of sticky situations but, naturally, only makes things worse. This includes making Julie think he's having an affair with a psycho stalker (Lucy Punch) and breaking into the loft of an arrogant artist and notorious womanizer (Jemaine Clement) who's one of Julie's top clients. They also run into Zach Galifianakis, underused in a one-note role as Barry's work rival who fancies himself an expert in mind control.

Too often, these scenarios are uncomfortable for the viewer — not because of their intended awkward comedy, but because they're just plain tedious to watch.

But Clement, best known for "Flight of the Conchords," is a total scream here, cut very much from the same skintight cloth as Russell Brand in "Forgetting Sarah Marshall" and "Get Him to the Greek." It's as if he exists in his own movie — a deliciously weirder and infinitely more interesting one.

"Dinner for Schmucks," a Paramount Pictures release, is rated PG-13 for sequences of crude and sexual content, some partial nudity and language. Running time: 114 minutes. Two stars out of four.

___

Motion Picture Association of America rating definitions:

G — General audiences. All ages admitted.

PG — Parental guidance suggested. Some material may not be suitable for children.

PG-13 — Special parental guidance strongly suggested for children under 13. Some material may be inappropriate for young children.

R — Restricted. Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian.

NC-17 — No one under 17 admitted.


Topics

US Film Review Dinner for Schmucks





beltway confidential
Obama embraces his inner cliche

He finished speaking in Cleveland by urging his audience to “choose the future over the past.” A good thing — we should move on to 2011 instead of repeating...

—David Freddoso

The other (alleged) top candidate for Rahm’s job was also a Fannie Mae lobbyist

When I blogged this morning about Tom Donilon, possibly the next White House chief of staff, I didn’t mean to imply that his resume as Goldman consultant and Fannie Mae...

—Timothy P. Carney

Virginia congressman admits: ‘If you don’t tie our hands, we will keep stealing.’

Here’s what a major mid-term correction looks like: On March 16, when confronted by members of the Jefferson Area Tea Party, Rep. Tom Perriello, D-Va., made a startling...

—Barbara Hollingsworth

‘Concern trolling’ scandal not hurting Paul yet

Republican Rand Paul leads by 15 points in yet another survey, this one from Rasmussen: Paul is now supported by 54% of Likely Voters in Kentucky, when leaners are added,...

—David Freddoso

More Beltway Confidential posts...

To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines
  1. LovEvolution canceled due to dispute on location
  2. Man who tried to rob cop’s house sentenced to two years
  3. Boy violently assaulted in latest iPod theft
  4. Unusual weather leaves some SF neighborhoods without power
  5. Windsurfing trip turns into waterlogged nightmare
  6. Driver accused in fatal hit-and-run arraigned
  7. Fidel Castro apologizes for sending cuban gays to labor camps, Foreign Policy says he deserves ‘plaudits’
  8. Oakland Airport tram gains needed funds
  9. Young punk assaults, robs elderly woman
  10. Victims in deadly Lake Merced car crash identified





 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 200 words. Comments that advocate violence, racism, or libel as well as comments written in ALL CAPS are not permitted.
blog comments powered by Disqus
RSS | Twitter | Facebook | Mobile | Contact Us | Rack Locations | Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy