Categories: Letters

Letters: Less affluent residents need transit options

“Which neighborhoods in SF use Uber and Lyft the least?” The City, Sept. 3
Less affluent residents need transit options

Your report today on the “data dive” by the San Francisco County Transit Authority (read: our Board of Supervisors who constitute it) into use of Uber and Lyft in San Francisco is a refreshing shot of reality into the patterns of use not only by income-flush millennials and others but also the transit needs of less affluent city residents.

The SFCTA has turned a deaf ear as neighborhood after neighborhood has protested Muni’s speed-it-up transit plans, which eliminate many stops on key routes, or questioned the need for removing car lanes for ostensibly safety-improving platforms, which may not be uniformly required especially if tickets were issued to motorists failing to stop behind trains as law requires; it has let Muni and corporate San Francisco have its way.

Engineering plans that may have made some sense before Uber and Lyft flooded city streets are now allowing taxis to use transit-only lanes. Yet, lower income riders in the outer reaches of town, including motorists, are less well-served. (Witness the small, token survey going on along the L-Taraval route to decide which stops to eliminate and how to make up for lost parking spaces where boarding platforms will eliminate curbside parking.)

Paying attention to data is fine — but working to modify engineering plans that DO NOT SERVE long-term transit users very well would make more sense. Let’s hear the SFCTA and Board of Supervisors’ “data dive” on that: Hold a public hearing on boarding platforms and stop elimination!

Diana Scott
San Francisco

Race has no part in it

I just read your story about Uber and Lyft usage in Sept. 3 edition. Early in the story, it’s mentioned that this data presents where San Francisco’s “… wealthy, single, and white …” transportation users reside.

I did not see anything in your article that talks specifically about the breakdown of color or ethnicity of users in any of the data. The only mention of ethnicity is, I’ll assume, a quote from Grande regarding “cholo culture.” No mention of single or married status either, that I saw.

I understand the concern of losing Muni lines in less-affluent neighborhoods, but what does color or race have to do with this?

S. Buschman
San Francisco

Examiner Readers
Published by
Examiner Readers

Recent Posts

SF transit agency may approve dockless bike expansion

More dockless electric bikes may soon hit the streets of San Francisco, following a briefing at The City’s transit board…

10 hours ago

SF targets city’s biggest buildings to reduce trash going to landfill

San Francisco has abandoned a more than decade-old goal of sending zero waste to the landfill by 2020 but now…

10 hours ago

Does a Republican have a chance of winning an SF supervisor race?

A Republican candidate for supervisor says a new survey he funded shows he has a shot at winning an election…

10 hours ago

San Francisco 49ers passing attack scrutinized after close win over Detroit

By C.J. Peterson Special to S.F. Examiner The 49ers secured their first win of the 2018 season on Sunday but…

11 hours ago

Jonathan Wilson revels in rock ‘n’ roll classicism

North Carolina-bred, Los Angeles-based tunesmith and producer Jonathan Wilson has found his unique artistic vision to be both a blessing…

11 hours ago

San Francisco Giants get contributions from old and young in win over San Diego Padres

With Brandon Belt on the bench with a mysterious knee ailment -- his MRI late last weekend came back clean…

13 hours ago