A federal judge issued a stay to the Trump Administration’s partial asylum ban on Monday night, according to U.S. District Court officials.

The ruling was delivered by U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar and American Civil Liberties Union officials called it an initial victory in a lawsuit being filed by four groups, led by the East Bay Sanctuary Covenant.

The temporary restraining order will be in effect until Tigar holds another hearing on whether to issued a preliminary injunction.

The ban was issued by the Trump Administration in response to a caravan of Central American immigrants approaching the southern border of the United States and intending to claim for asylum when arriving at the southern border. The ban mandates that immigrants either in the U.S. or outside of it applying for asylum must do so at a designated entry point.

Trump’s proclamation cited the caravan of Central American migrants now approaching the Mexican border and said the measure was needed to prevent “overloading of our immigration and asylum system.”

“This ban is illegal, will put people’s lives in danger, and raises the alarm about President Trump’s disregard for separation of powers,” ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt said in a statement. “There is no justifiable reason to flatly deny people the right to apply for asylum, and we cannot send them back to danger based on the manner of their entry. Congress has been clear on this point for decades.”

The asylum restriction stems from a combination of a rule issued by the Trump Administration on Nov. 8 and the president’s proclamation the next day. The rule, issued on an emergency basis, authorized the president to issue a proclamation denying asylum eligibility to people who cross the border with Mexico illegally. The president then did so.

The government contends the immediate rule was allowed under a foreign affairs exception because the administration is negotiating with Mexico about a possible “safe third country” agreement in which immigrants would be required to apply for asylum in Mexico first.

Known as East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump, the lawsuit also accuses the Trump Administration with violating the Immigration and Nationality Act – which mandates that anyone attempting to claim asylum in
the U.S. can do so at any port of entry – as well as the Administrative Procedure Act by not allowing a 30-day public comment period.

The other defendants of the case are Al Otro Lado, Innovation Law Lab and the Central American Resource Center in Los Angeles.

Bay City News
Share
Published by
Bay City News

Recent Posts

Yemeni mother granted travel ban waiver to visit dying son at Oakland hospital

A Yemeni mother is receiving a visa waiver that will allow her to see her 2-year-old son clinging to life…

1 hour ago

SF Preps Basketball: After Luong’s early barrage, Washington pulls away in fourth

GALILEO ACADEMY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY — Jackie Luong started off red-hot from beyond the arc on Monday night, but…

10 hours ago

Stephen Curry breaks 15,000-point mark against Memphis Grizzlies

OAKLAND — Five minutes before his Monday morning press conference, hours before tip off against the visiting Memphis Grizzlies, Warriors…

13 hours ago

Golden State Warriors find their joy, Stephen Curry passes 15,000 points against Conley-less Grizzlies

OAKLAND — Over the last three games, with both Stephen Curry and Draymond Green back on the floor, Golden State…

15 hours ago

City College of San Francisco running back DeShawn Collins commits to Cal, will sign Wednesday

For the past two years, DeShawn Collins has been working at San Francisco International Airport, 30 hours a week. Sometimes,…

17 hours ago

Storm surge waves in San Francisco Bay draw crowds, surfers

A storm surge created big waves that attracted crowds and surfers to the waters around Crissy Field and Fort Point…

17 hours ago