Entertainment

[Print]  [Email]        

Bigger isn't better for new 'Transformers'

By: Rossiter Drake
Special to The Examiner
June 24, 2009

He’s back: An injured Shia LaBeouf battles the ’bots again in “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen.” (Courtesy photo)

SAN FRANCISCO — Loud, long and utterly incomprehensible, “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” is an exquisitely painful experience that pummels the senses as it confounds the intellect.

 What is John Turturro doing here? An accomplished actor (“O Brother, Where Art Thou?”) and director (“Romance & Cigarettes”), he is hardly alone in being reduced to a hysterical stereotype in Michael Bay’s latest affront — Shia LaBeouf and Megan Fox, among others, return for a second tour of duty on the Transformer front — but he seems the most out of place as an eccentric conspiracy theorist on a mission to defend the world from notoriously cranky Decepticons.

It’s a worthy mission, I guess, since the Decepticons, led by a Voldemort type known as The Fallen (voiced by Tony Todd), are determined to destroy the sun. Why? Who knows? Possibly because they regard mankind with the same contempt Bay seems to reserve for his audience.

Once again, Bay’s reliance on shaky camerawork and needless slo-mo — particularly as his characters race from one explosion to the next — proves a distraction, as does the deafeningly bombastic score that accompanies much of the action. The movie doesn’t look good, and the effects, which have long been the director’s strong suit, are unconvincing.

Of the first “Transformers” movie, I wrote that the story seemed inspired by a desire to sell toys and video games. Nothing has changed the second time around, except that the characters are more divorced from reality, the robots are dumber than rocks, and LaBeouf, who famously injured his hand during the shooting, is wearing a cast that the movie never bothers to explain.

Does it really matter what I or anyone else has to say about “Revenge of the Fallen”? Of course not. The audiences will be there regardless, whether they’re drawn by the epic CGI spectacle, fond memories of a childhood cartoon or an inexplicable belief that 2007’s “Transformers” was somehow incomplete.

Here, Bay has given those audiences less than they deserve, in the form of a singularly wretched piece of work punctuated by adolescent jokes and mindless mayhem.

MOVIE REVIEW
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, 1 star

Starring Shia LaBeouf, Megan Fox, Josh Duhamel, Tyrese Gibson, John Turturro
Written by Ehren Kruger, Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman
Directed by Michael Bay
Rated PG-13
Running time 2 hours 29 minutes
 



To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 8.0 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.


Most Popular Headlines



 


 



 

Reader Comments

All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Examiner or its staff. Comment box is limited to 250 words.

Thumper

Jul 10, 2009

So, um, exactly how many trips to the washroom did Mr. Drake make during the film?

1) The Fallen was going to convert the sun's energy into Energon (the Transformers "fuel".). Bathroom break #1?

2)Sam's hand was damaged as he came out of the SpaceBridge (the SpaceBridge is...never mind. It's over your head.). Pee break #2?

Here's a career suggestion for Mr. Drake - don't review any more movies in the comic/toy/scifi/fantasy,etc. genres. EVER. Stick with the charming indie films, or maybe romantic comedies. Something that doesn't require you to pay quite so much attention.

You obviously walked into this film with a chip on your shoulder, based on the first film. If you can't do an objective review, let someone else do it.

"Does it really matter what I or anyone else has to say about “Revenge of the Fallen”? Of course not."

Hey look! You actually wrote something valid! Kudos!

 

DeeJay

Jul 11, 2009

Thumper,

1) When the Fallen had Jetfire in his army, the need to destroy Earth's sun was eliminated. As you've already pointed out, Jetfire could teleport through space and there are millions of suns/stars to choose from, obsessing about ours was beyond stupid.

2) You still haven't explained how the characters found gauze and a cast in the middle of the desert.

I'm a big fan of the first one (I even purchased Jablonsky's score), but the story in this installment was horrid... and consistent with the idea that the studio forced the creators to rush the final project to completion.

-DeeJay

 

Alezmendi

Jul 12, 2009

Re: 2) I guess Jetfire teleported back to civilization and picked some up at his local Walgreens..... duh!

Seriously though. Good review. Man, what a wretched waste of time and effort this movie was.

 

ronnie

Jul 14, 2009

I absolutely back Thumper on this. Mr. Drake should stick to Indie/Oscar typos and not review action films. Besides, ROTF was meant for action and Megan Fox. (I only wish they had wittier/better jokes and a good script) but the action makes up for it all

 

Persiyan

Jul 16, 2009

Action?! What action?! The movie was filled with uncomprehansive fights combined with shaky camera, close ups, and constant change of angle. Tell me could honestly understand what was going on in any of the fights. I loved the first movie, this was a train wreck.

 

Samaha

Jul 24, 2009

It was horrid. Like an article in yahoo about this. The main hero ends up in Robot Heaven, ROBOT Heaven!?

The story was a drag, the sex-related jokes and the stereotype ghetto-bots just made me wonder who digests this humor or even processes this to be vaguely entertaining.

Action was its strong point (Perhaps...since the slow motion were the only times I could even see things go past), the end part was epic (Just the parts you see pea shooters go up against armored tanks), however made absolutely no sense and with the famous "Deus ex machina" Where Optimus gets a helping hand from the unexplainable Jetfire. I think at every turn there is a Deus ex machina cliche.

If Bumblebee died, or if Optimus decided to take a permanent dirt nap to the end of the movie. It wouldn't have made anymore sense, but the tragic outline would have given it some sorrow loss...other than that, I didn't even care who died. (Besides Jetfire, and well as usual decepticon fodder)

 

Zond

Sep 15, 2009

@ ronnie, so who should be reviewing action movies, according to you? Some hyped up teen? Someone who doesn't think too much? When is someone's taste too sophisticated to review action movies? I'd rather rely on "critical critics" like Drake, thank you very much.

 


Post a comment


Email:
(This will not be displayed or shared. Privacy Policy)

Display Name:

Comment:




Local

Strike outside Grand Hyatt, Newsom gets involved

Hotel workers in San Francisco are continuing to picket... Full story

Entertainment

Blackbird boasts fun, classic cocktails

A long list of stunning and proper classic cocktails,... Full story

Sports

Cal QB looking to erase bad memory against Beavers

Two years after his fourth-quarter mistake against Oregon State cost California a shot at becoming the top-ranked team in the nation, Kevin Riley can't escape the images of his blunder. Full story