Categories: Bay Area Politics

Board of Education to vote on diverting Proposition H funds

San Francisco's school board will vote tonight on whether to divert nearly $2.3 million of voter-approved school “enrichment” funds to soften the financial blow of a recently negotiated compensation package for teachers.

Proposition H was sold to voters in 2004 as a way to improve public education by allocating city funds — an increasing amount each year — to schools. Voters insisted that one-third of The City's annual allocation be earmarked for free preschool programs, and another one-third be designated for sports, arts, libraries and music in district schools. The district can use the remaining one-third for “general uses.”

A community advisory committee recommended that a portion of that third discretionary pot, $2.28 million, be earmarked for counselors and extra high school support staff for the 2006-07 school year. The district is counting on that money, however, to help pay for a 2 percent retroactive pay increase given to teachers that is expected to cost the district $5.4 million in 2005-06, according to Myong Leigh, the district's chief of policy and planning.

In addition, $1.9 million of this year's general-use allocation — designated for elementary school counselors, nurses, social workers and learning support consultants — is also being considered for use to help pay for the raises promised to teachers. The money is currently unspent due to hiring difficulties, according to district officials.

In 2007-08, when the bill for the teacher increases is expected to jump to $13 million, the district will receive $20 million in Prop. H money, half of which is discretionary and could also be used for teacher compensation.

San Francisco parent Novella Smith, who campaigned to help pass Prop. H and served on the community advisory committee that made the spending recommendations, said she was “disheartened” that the money would be used for general operating expenses, instead of educational extras.

“I want to see the teachers get raises. I think it's shameful what we've done to teachers, but I don't love using Prop. H funds to make that happen,” Smith said. “It's probably legal, it's certainly not what's expected to be used for those funds.”

beslinger@examiner.com

SF Examiner
Share
Published by
SF Examiner

Recent Posts

A few words about critters with English Beat’s Dave Wakeling

At 61, San Fernando-Valley-based Brit Dave Wakeling knows how surreal it sounds to have not one, but two, viable versions…

2 hours ago

Rejected scooter company files appeal, calls SF permit process ‘secret’ and ‘unlawful’

An e-scooter company rejected from San Francisco’s shared scooter pilot program has filed an appeal, alleging The City’s application criteria…

3 hours ago

Drivers to pay Treasure Island toll in both directions starting in 2021

Starting in 2021, drivers travelling to or from Treasure Island will be forced to pay a toll in addition to…

3 hours ago

1 dead, 1 arrested in SoMa hit and run

A 65-year-old man was struck and killed by a vehicle in a hit-and-run in San Francisco's South of Market neighborhood…

7 hours ago

If you want to address climate change, clean up the air

Like climate change itself, recent environmental news from throughout the country can feel overwhelming and scary. As leaders from around…

15 hours ago

Transportation justice requires housing justice, and vice versa

Why should transportation advocates support ballot measures put forth by housing activists? And why should housing activists defend a gas…

15 hours ago